Skip to content

How should an IP forecast show uncertain prosecution costs?

Separate scheduled work from conditional events without inventing probabilities.

Start with the short answer
Scheduled events on a solid path with dashed branches for conditional costs.
IP Financial IntelligenceFocused answerIP Forecasting

Short answer

Distinguish scheduled events from conditional work. Record the trigger, evidence and review point for each assumption, and avoid assigning probabilities without support.

Separate scheduled and conditional work

An illustrative review path, not a legal procedure or a probability model.

  1. Is the event supported by the current record?

    If yes
    Record the event, timing and source.
    If no
    Flag the missing input for review.
  2. Does the work depend on a future trigger?

    If yes
    Describe the trigger and keep conditional work distinguishable.
    If no
    Record the basis for treating it as scheduled activity.
  3. Is there evidence for a scenario assumption?

    If yes
    Document that evidence and its review date.
    If no
    Do not invent a probability or present a range as validated.

Record the assumption beside the scenario

Hypothetical scenario record

Baseline
The scope and assumptions currently under review.
Alternative
A clearly named conditional event, without an invented likelihood.
Review point
An identified record change or expert review that would update the assumption.

Bring the planning questions together.

Explore how Prokurio approaches forecasts and estimates.

Explore forecasting